In 1924 van Doesburg published his “De Stijl”
architecture manifest, where exposed the new concepts of modern design termed
by him as Neo-Plasticism. In this manifest van Doesburg showed that the times
are changing. Buildings should not be based on any historical style. The new
architecture should be elemental, functional and economical. Statues and
corbels replaced by bare steel beams and glass panels. According to author
“These elements – such as function, mass, surface, time, space, light,
color, material, etc –are plastic.”
Pure elemental forms are not obstructed by old norms
and definitions of beauty. The buildings and the structure itself are not
defined by concrete from the beginning. The availability of the new materials
for construction caused huge development of creativity. The wall doesn’t have
to be the load-bearing, solid wall anymore, and the window become wall. The
inside and the outside merge into one space.
“The new architecture has disrupted the wall and, in so doing, destroyed
the division between inside and outside”
 |
Contra-Construction Project, Axonometric, van Doesburg, 1923 |
One of the well-known model of van Doesburg is
Contra-Construction Project Axonometric. It is an interesting two-dimensional
representation of a project of a private home. Van Doesburg did not contain
clear designation of floors and windows. The outline of the house can be seen
with the essence of De Stijl. There are large open spaces in the design which
is consistent with the idea of keeping the new architecture open.
“The new architecture is open.
The whole consists of a single space, which is subdivided according to
functional requirements.”
Opening spaces in close connected with development of the new building
system. First samples of the new structure encouraged by Doesburg was made few
decades before his statements in De Stijl. In the 1870s took place the
introduction of the structural steel. It caused the technical innovations and
initiated production of the skeletal-frame concept in the 1880s. Engineers and
architects got aware of the potential of replacing the very thick, heavy
load-bearing walls of the masonry system with lighter, thinner construction of
the skeletal frame. Architects and engineers were experimenting with shape
combinations that produced the most efficient columns, girder, beams, ect. Wide
flange shapes in common use today.
 |
Turning Torso, S. Calatrava, 2005 |
“Walls are no longer load-bearing; they have been reduced to points of
support”
The skeletal and skin system might be compared to the human body, which
has a rigid bony skeleton to support its basic frame and a more fragile skin
for sheathing. We find it in modern skyscrapers, with their steel frames
(skeletons) supporting the structure and a
sheathing (skin) of glass or some other light material. Also, most houses today
are built with a skeleton of wood beams nailed together, topped with a
sheathing of light wood boards, shingles, aluminum siding.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario